Read the system
Two weeks in the codebase, the infrastructure and the deploys.
Decisions, in the order you should make them
Why technical
strategy matters?
An incorrect architecture decision at the start can take years to correct. We work with founders, product leads, and engineering teams. Together we make technology decisions that are based on facts, not on current fashion.
Comprehensive Architecture Reviews
We examine your system: the database design, the service limits, and the deployment configuration. We then record the parts that operate correctly, the parts that are weak, and the parts to correct first.
Objective Stack Selection
If a team selects a technology because it is fashionable, that team frequently writes the system again in two years. We compare languages, frameworks, and databases with your actual requirements and the skills of your team.
Digital Transformation Leadership
A legacy system is not always a problem. We plan and control large architecture migrations, from a monolith to services. The interruption to your business stays low.
How we work
How a technical review actually runs.
Short, specific and written down. You end with decisions and an order to make them in, not a deck.
Put the options side by side
Cost, risk and timeline for each, including doing nothing.
Sequence the work
Dependency order, so every stage leaves you something usable.
Architecture review
A written assessment of the system as it is, with the risks named.
Technology roadmap
A sequenced plan in dependency order, costed stage by stage.
Stack selection
Recommendations with the reasoning attached, including what we ruled out.
Cost modelling
What the current path costs over three years against the alternatives.
Team and hiring advice
What skills the plan needs, and whether to build or buy the capacity.
Ongoing review
A standing session as the plan meets reality.